All arguments for God explained in 10 minutes

“Imaginary numbers don’t correspond to reality” electrical engineers: 😐

'Basically, if your pizza gets infinitely great, it'll turn into God' -Redeemed Zoomer, 2024

I was a stern atheist until the second you said "trust me bro". After that I went immeadiatly getting baptized and now I go to church every day.

A thing about Pascal's Wager is that whether it can be an argument for God, it can't be the reason to why you choose to believe in God. If your only reason to believe in God is because of the potential benefit you may gain from it and nothing else then it kind of defeats the purpose of believing in god in the first place, since what ties you to that belief isn't morality or logic but just the benefit you may gain from it. This means that if someone were to offer you something better than what god gives you, you would reject god, which means you didn't truly believe in him in the first place.

I love the part where RZ said its mathin time, then mathed everything, and the atheists were left completely mathed out.

"Trust me, bro." - my beloved brother in Christ

"Darwinian evolution can't explain the 4 constants of the universe" That's because Darwinian evolution is part of biology, not physics. It's also a bit of a misnomer to say darwinian evolution, as there is alot more to modern evolutionary biology than, just what Darwin contributed with

"You can be strong, but you're not." Sad truth. 😔😔

6. Ontological: A pizza that is indestructible cannot be eaten, so it is not the greatest possible pizza since it cannot fulfill the fundamental purpose of pizza.

Honestly Pascal’s Wager reminds me of a different side of the same coin (sort of). Marcus Aurelius essentially stated, “Live a good life. If there is a god and they are just, they will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are unjust gods, then you will not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then your memory will live on in those who you have lived virtue by.”

Cosmic Skeptic sent me. Enjoyed the video!

I love the fact that you use meme language and simple explanations to explain old, complex ideas. I often watch these when I just need a simple reminder when I get too lost in the complex theological train of thought. Thank you for all of your videos!

As a mathematical physicists, I would like to make one comment about the mathematical view: the reason why math is so general is because it is essentialy the study of relations between concepts. The concepts (axioms) are entirely arbitrary to ones choice (such as the existence of i, it can only exist as an axiom), but, once you accept it, you may find how other results derive from it. As another clear example, once you accept Euclides axioms for geometry, it is a fact that Pythagoras theorem is True, no matter where you are in the universe or the time you are in. The real surprise, though, comes from the fact that, when applied to explaining the World, mathematical models give such a good description within a range that it is possible to measure, and that suxh description is somehow understandable to us (e.g newtonian mechanics). For those more interested, I recommend a paper called "the unreasonable effectiveness of math in rela world" (or something like that) by Wigner

Just wanna point out the absolute banger "You see, it all started in the establishment of the first Russian state in 862" at 1:29 , a funny note to the Tucker/Putin interview

For a bit of context on the Euler argument, e^i*x is a rotation of x radians (a more mathematical unit for angle [instead of degrees]) in the complex plane around 0. I don’t fully understand the proofs of this, but you can research them if you would like to know more. Pi radians is the equivalent of 180 degrees, and a 180 degree turn around the complex plane is -1. (This is obvious if you just visualise a 180 degree turn). Therefore e^(i*pi) = -1 and if you add 1 to both sides you get e^(i*pi) +1 = 0 The argument that this is proof for god is because this is a very beautiful equation due to its simplicity and bringing together all the nice numbers. However, you can break every part of this equation down to the fundamentals of maths and understand why it works this way, so it’s not really an inexplicable mystery as to why this equation is so beautiful and neat.

The best explanation I've seen about the types of arguments, thank you so much.

I like the Teleological argument with Hebrews 3:4 which says "For every house is built by someone, but God is the builder of everything."

Redeemed Zoomer was actually first discovered by zooming in on a Mandelbrot set infinitely to the point where it becomes impossible to deny the existence of God, and one is forced to accept Him as Savior and is thereby redeemed through zooming.

I’m studying pure mathematics and it feels like you are missing the point that mathematics is just an abstract perspective on what we can learn given a set of rules. All math we come up with must be built upon axioms (rules) we have made from the start. The goal is to see how far we can go with them.

4:13 wait did he just ask Darwin, who wrote a book on the evolution of species and NOT on physics, and who died over A HUNDRED YEARS AGO to explain modern physics concepts.