Deleuze Guattari: Societies of Control and Antipsychiatry

Published 2012-09-21
This is a 43 min video presentation, the text can be read here the-simulon.blogspot.ca/ the information concerns a very important global issue of today on the subject of techno-cybernetic control of governments and society that is responsible for a great number of technologically unrelated global issues such as global capitalism, social media, social control, global exploitation, the global elite, bio-power, trilateral and unilateral economic domination, civil war, war in the Middle East, colonization, the world economy, Third World exploitation, famine, environmental issues, the politics of race, gender, sexuality and mental illness. A subject that is rarely if ever discussed in a global context. It was derived from a transcript I wrote on Gilles Deleuze's 1990 'Postscript on the Societies of Control' inspired by Gary Hall, Clare Bichall and Peter Woodbridge's 2010 text and video 'Deleuze's Postscript on Societies of Control' published in Culture Machine. It includes as well a historical overview of the antipsychiatry movement in France which Felix Guattari participated during the 1960's and 1970's. Integrated into the theory, the presentation also shows an exact correlation of Norbert Wiener's principle thesis of Cybernetics with the Deleuzian-Guattarian concept of gaseous and fluidic forms and flows of corporate capital in today's society, the micropolitics of control, deterritorialized assemblages, and distributed networks such as the internet, Facebook, social community organizing in neocapitalist democracies, IBM agenda, global policing, military police, community organization, enforcement and manipulation by technological monitoring and scanning of public spaces and information privacy issues. Social democracy and corporate governance is theorized in a post-structuralist interpretation of emerging globalization issues and pinpoints some of the mechanisms involved suggesting that politicians and the corporate entities that run their embodied governments (including the monetary economic system) are manipulated by humans who in turn are being controled at a higher level by invisible technological processes of cybernetics. A generalized model of technological control and cybernetic government -- the cutting edge of contemporary 'conspiracy' and cultural theory. If you follow the discourse of Zizek, Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, the occupy movement, Jean Baudrillard, simulacra, transhumanism and The Matrix movies you will gain immense insight and a philosophico-scientific account of what has been going on in the world today and the world of tommarow.

All Comments (21)
  • @Throwingness
    This is so rich with insights it looks new every time I watch it.
  • This is an awesome production. A thoroughly enjoyable evocation of D&G. I didn't even know how to be a person before reading their stuff.
  • @deprogramr
    really incredible video Jer Jae, thanks for making...
  • @ShdwftheSuN
    I fear this essay will be as prophetic as Marx's Capital, over a hundred years' ahead of its time. Marx predicted almost to the letter what is happening now with global late-stage capitalism and the over-financialization of society, where through debt we enslave ourselves to the contradictions of capital. It's not too late to turn things around, and we are seeing that happen with the rise of a global left movement, but this essay predicts what will happen if we fail. Pretty terrifying, especially if you consider that if we lose, capitalism will so thoroughly destroy our planet and material standards of living that cybernetic control would HAVE to be implemented to prevent 11 billion people from revolting against their masters.
  • @TURNKEYiNK
    Well, now I know what a computer on Valium sounds like.
  • This sounds very nice. I have a bigger background with deleuzes texts on other philosophers (nietzsche, bergson, spinoza, kant, etc) but am finally coming into more of the stuff he did with guattari.
  • Taking into consideration that you are just beginning to read Deleuze, I would recommend the Deleuze Dictionary. The entire notion of a Deleuzian dictionary is very counter intuitive but it is actually quite helpful. Deleuze never uses the same word with with the same meaning twice but the text does a fairly good job presenting the general context and the lines of flight.
  • @peremontana2201
    It is more difficult to realize how and to wich extent we are slaves than actually breaking free
  • @S2Cents
    I always found Chomsky lectures and interviews immanently useful and highly illuminating well beyond what Continental philosophers say about power, politics, etc. (Not that those deep thinkers are wrong). Chomsky gets right to what it means in plain English and without oversimplification.
  • Well written clear elucidation of ideas and reading of D&G. Ironic computer voice works well.
  • @nickopeters
    Many of us have wondered why a man writing against cyberism would use a robot to read us his paper. Many people who get knowledgeable enough to write a paper like this one, have reached their sixties or later by that point, by which point they may also have lost enough breathing function, that they cannot complete reading a sentence in a single breath, nor draw the next breath within the time that fits intelligible recitation of the text. This would be bad enough while reading the fluffiest prose, but when reading extremely advanced material like this, so-much the-worse. And also, they would have lost the part of their vocal compass any more than a tiny bit below their regular speaking pitch, adding an unacceptable vocal artifact every few syllables or so. Before the Internet, recorded speeches would have been published formally, with the budget to hire a "paid reader" to do the recitation, but with "self-publishing," a publishing "budget" is often nonexistent. Lots of people can not "recite" their own writings "intelligibly" or esthetically acceptably, into a recording microphone. This is why they would resort to, using a robotic narrator, to get the job-done "semi-decently," even realizing it's still quite "sub-ideal." Thank you.
  • @Firejack95
    This is astounding! Did you write this? If so, could you please provide a link to the text? I would very much like to read it.
  • Yes, please let me know if you need any files and want to discourse with me. I need to practice my english!
  • @sjuvanet
    i cant believe this is seven years old
  • @hotstixx
    Swimming through toffee. Would love to have heard this..badly missed opportunity.