Physicists Have Proven That the Universe Does Not Exist!
7,619
Published 2024-07-25
All Comments (20)
-
This is not a new concept. The Bible, The Bhagavad Gita, and a number of other religious texts have uncovered this. Even The Force touches on this in The Empire Strikes Back.
-
I'm going to bed I've got an headache.
-
Ah! That explains why I didn’t see this video.
-
How does the holographic principle change our understanding of information and its role in shaping the universe?
-
We are all traveling souls on a wavelength of light
-
Interesting
-
The foolishness of the physicist is real.
-
Yeah right. Prove it totally?
-
why now declared all of this? u know all that and wont tell us before ?
-
Ok the universe doesn't exist, and everyone's always saying " the universe did this or that"-- never liked that comment....aaannnnd the moon is made of green cheese( sarcasm intended) don't even have the patience to watch to the end to see if they were just joking
-
All energy is in constant distribution and transformation through space/time a complete system
-
Thousands of years ago the greatest Vedantist Adhi Sankaracharya had asserted that the Universe, Time are illusions and not all living beings experience universe and time the same way! Only Consciousness is eternal and real but the universe and time are experiences in consciousness! Sakshi Chitanyam or witnessed illusions!
-
I’m not convinced of this theory…it’s just too facile.
-
Well duh. Read your Bible if you have one
-
Nah.
-
You present a distorted and inaccurate view of scientific understanding, and seem more interested in presenting a compelling narrative than in accurately representing the current state of scientific research. 1. False claim about physicists "proving" the universe doesn't exist: This statement is entirely false. Physicists do not claim the universe is an illusion in any literal sense. 2. Misunderstanding of quantum mechanics: While quantum mechanics introduces uncertainty and observer effects at the subatomic level, it doesn't mean everyday objects disappear when we don't look at them. You oversimplify and misrepresent the "observer effect." 3. Conflating scientific theories with speculation: You seamlessly blend the holographic principle (a theoretical framework) with unproven claims about consciousness, implying they are equally valid. 4. Misrepresenting the limitations of relativity: While the theory of relativity has limitations in explaining certain phenomena like black hole singularities, it remains a cornerstone of modern physics, accurately describing a vast range of gravitational interactions and making GPS and google directions possible. 5. Cherry-picking evidence and exaggerating claims: You use the example of the James Webb Space Telescope's findings to suggest current physics is fundamentally flawed, which is a misrepresentation. The telescope's observations push the boundaries of our understanding, but they don't invalidate existing theories. 6. Appealing to anecdotal evidence: The mention of Ingo Swan's remote viewing of Jupiter is an example of using anecdotal evidence to support extraordinary claims. 7. Sensationalism and clickbait tactics: The overall tone is sensationalistic, using phrases like "biggest lie of all time" and "universe of pure consciousness" to grab attention and create intrigue.
-
One of the stupidest videos made … Or maybe it doesn’t actually exist? Do I exist?
-
You are still a long way off from the truth of which you are paying a deaf ear. And that truth is; the universe and all things were created by a Mighty Spiritual Being who name is God. Believe in him and you get some understanding of why things are the way they are, and more.
-
So dead relatives are not stars in the sky? 🫤