Supreme Court rules in favor of Jan. 6 defendant in dispute over obstruction charge

Published 2024-06-28
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of a former Pennsylvania police officer charged for his alleged participation in the U.S. Capitol attack, saying a felony obstruction charge was improperly applied in his case. This ruling makes it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, a charge that also has been brought against former President Donald Trump.

All Comments (21)
  • @wakeup8922
    The last 12 hours has been rough on Democrats and the media. LOL
  • Using a statue meant for financial crimes with J6, mostly peaceful demonstration, is sickening , folks.
  • @johnl5316
    Not everyone who ws charged was a rioter. Some had not even entered the building
  • @Goyisamau
    Grandes cosas pueden suceder para aquellos que creen en Dios. Estaba deprimido porque tenía una deuda de más de 12,000, pero a Dios sea la gloria, saldé mi deuda y sigo ganando para mí y mi familia. Dios bendiga a la Sra. Regina Maria Howard, Dios la ha usado para cambiar muchas vidas. 🇺🇸
  • @dellaw1633
    There was no insurrection. Rest in Peace Ashli Babbitt 🌺🇺🇸
  • @cipher940
    The sentences imposed on J6rs are barbaric.
  • @ouiroc
    Never forget the only one murdered that day was Ashley Babbitt buy the Capitol Police bird with no charges
  • Just love how the journalist starts out that people storm the Capitol. No bias there, folks
  • Your reporter doesn’t know that the Supreme Court has agreed to work into July since they have 11-12 remaining cases to hear.
  • Does this decision telegraph what decision the Supreme Court will make on the most important ruling on whether Trump has Immunity?
  • Well lets see how Garland 🤔 disappointing attitude is when he is sent to Prison because there is no choice of the color uniform chosen 😉 just for him!