How to fix Harvard

4,104
0
Published 2024-03-28
"A lot of the problems that universities have faced come from the fact that deans, provosts, and presidents just want to make trouble go away. And so if someone is yelling at them and making their life miserable, they'll do whatever it takes to get them to shut up," argues Steven Pinker.

Watch the full episode of The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie featuring Steven Pinker here:    • What went wrong at Harvard | Steven P...  

Subscribe to The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie
Youtube:    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie  
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/69l53aQZ3VjbESh7tqHM4j?si=76…
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-reason-interview…

All Comments (19)
  • @Vlabar
    Why bother fixing Harvard.
  • I’d like to go TP Harvard with Nick while high on Acid, prolly be a real kick
  • @catorials444
    Does it help that most supreme court judges come from harvard or Yale?
  • "emh students have ideas that are not accepted by a certain political party, bad, we need to improve"
  • Intelligentsia... Intellectual discourse in the US, is virtually dead. Cant be done anymore. Except by people who are experts at balancing the thin line. While lunatics are screaming and throwing things at them from all sides.
  • I love Stephen, however, he’s not the guy to suggest changes. He’s never run anything and is an intellectual fellow traveler. Listen to Eric Weinstein on his ideas. It’ll take a hard ass to change the institution. First, identify its areas of excellence. Protect that. Find its cancer (social sciences, or any other soft area). Starting defunding and firing. Start hiring conservative professors. Don’t lower standards, but be pro-active. Give the new leader 10 years fixed contract.
  • @markblack5460
    Harvard would best serve the American people as a strip mall or a parking lot.😊
  • Institutional neutrality is impossible. You can't be neutral on a moving train. University of Chicago can claim ignorance of this all it wants, but societies look to their leading institutions for guidance, whether they admit it or not. I respect Pinker but must disagree on this point. It's true that certain people will be upset that a statement is not "just right" like Goldilocks would want. But the institutions are actors in society. They have to act like them.
  • I think when a person makes a decision to have long hair, but can't see the optics of their own poor self care, they shouldn't really have any weight placed on their opinion.