LISTEN: Justices question Trump’s lawyers on what's considered an official act
20,757
Published 2024-04-25
“What is plausible about the president insisting and creating a fraudulent slate of electoral candidates?” Sotomayor asked Trump lawyer John Sauer.
Sauer responded that it was “absolutely” plausible that creating a second slate of electors was within the president’s rights.
Earlier, Justice Samuel Alito raised the issue of SEAL Team Six being used for political purposes. A lower court had raised a similar issue, asking whether an order given by the commander in chief to the military would be an official act. Sauer responded that a president could do that under some circumstances.
“I'm sure you've thought of lots of hypotheticals where the president could say ‘I'm using an official power,’ and yet the president uses it in an absolutely outrageous manner,” Alito said.
Subscribe:
Newsletters: www.pbs.org/newshour/subscribe
PBS NewsHour podcasts: www.pbs.org/newshour/podcasts
Stream your PBS favorites with the PBS app: to.pbs.org/2Jb8twG
Find more from PBS NewsHour at www.pbs.org/newshour
Subscribe to our YouTube channel: bit.ly/2HfsCD6
Follow us:
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@pbsnews
Twitter: www.twitter.com/newshour
Instagram: www.instagram.com/newshour
Facebook: www.pbs.org/newshour
All Comments (21)
-
It is outrageous that SCOTUS is even hearing this case.
-
It’s time to impeach half of the Supreme Court
-
Trump isn't arguing he's innocent, he's arguing he has the right to be a criminal.
-
Ensuring official electoral votes is not the same as delivering false electoral votes.
-
IT IS RIDICULOUS TO ME THAT THERE EVEN HAS TO BE A HEARING ON RATHER OR NOT A INDIVIDUAL CAN HAVE COMPLETE IMMUNITY FROM THE LAW! - Regardless Of What Ever Polotical Office They Held! - what an embarrassment for our " USA"!🇺🇲/ Pa.
-
How can this "lawyer " argue these lies, so disgusting
-
It should have a sign saying "Judge for Bribing"
-
This is another loser for trump. Jack Smith and Georgia get your cases ready for trial. Time is of the essence.
-
It is clear SCOMAGA is just trying to find a way to support Trump.
-
Seal team should send this lawyer and all Rep SCOTUS a text saying "If POTUS has immunity, we know where you are and we are standing by"
-
He couldn’t do anything illegal with checks and balances in place, therefore it’s impossible for him to do anything illegal 😂🤡
-
Scotussr just went to 95% of american disapproval,way to go!!!
-
If Scotus gives Trump blanket immunity, then Biden should order seal team 6 to take out Trump.
-
anyone hungry? There's extra word salad.
-
Hogwash.
-
Scary arguments…. Trying to proove that the earth is flat
-
Terrible sound bite, no clear beginning or end
-
Does this lawyer think if he talks fast enough he'll get over? Just blurt it out at 200 w.p.m. ?
-
Cmon 😂 PBS you are losing all credibility with the American people.
-
This isn’t about Trump, it’s about the constitutional issues that the Trump case has highlighted the fact that we haven’t defined presidential immunity. The court needs to establish the precedent which will be applied to every president going forward. So the questions are far more important than this case. The court will likely define immunity and remove the case from the DC court and send it to a circuit court which will have prosecutorial guidelines. There are a lot of commenters on here who don’t even understand the function of the court. 🤦♂️
