Ep 131: Thomas Mahnken on Thinking Strategically (War in Ukraine #3)

Published 2024-07-10
Thomas Mahnken, President and CEO of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments and contributor to War in Ukraine: Conflict, Strategy, and the Return of a Fractured World, joins the show to talk about the inherent fallacies that strategic planners should, but don’t always, account for.

Times
01:33 Introduction
02:30 Fallacies of rationality
05:36 Is war irrational?
10:02 Germany willed WWI to happen
15:40 Fallacy of the irrational/hyper-rational adversary
22:53 Rational/irrational Hitler
28:09 Wrapped around the rational axle
30:34 Fallacy of over/underestimating the adversary
37:53 Losing the contingency
41:08 Fallacies of interaction
45:56 Learning but not doing
50:53 Building defenses against fallacies

All Comments (6)
  • @itamarben9773
    Excellent podcast. Unfortunately here in Israel a recurring problem is that even our war planners do not plan for war and deem it unlikely. So that when war comes our army is not the size it needs to be, our armement stockpiles non existant and ability to manufacture still beyond the horizon. We are constantly pursuing peace by consessions while our enemies pursue maxamilist goals. It is good to hear the sobering analysis that our own general staff has not internalized. With all that said, it would be fascinating to hear a podcast that outlines the US's grand strategy and then follow up podcast that articulate that strategy in East Asia, Europe and the ME. Thanks again for this podcast that Im pretty sure is peerless.
  • @markb8468
    "Euclidean geometry of rationality" excellent analogy.
  • Was Sadam Hussein irrational? Well he didnt have WMDs in the end
  • @LR-jk2jk
    When you describe Hitler, I think Putin.