'Most Ridiculous Thing Ever': Officials Split Building in Two to Solve Property Dispute

1,589,924
0
Published 2019-10-21
An Ohio town's government tried to settle a property dispute by splitting a building into two pieces.

All Comments (21)
  • @The_CIA
    Thank God it wasn't a custody dispute...
  • @FreedomsNurse
    Just imagine if the farmer had built his shed on county property. Endless fines and fees.
  • @ztruth9861
    If the farmer put anything outside of his property line accidentally, he would have been financially decimated, dragged through litigation, harassed and jailed if he didn't play along.
  • @mayebeline1149
    A lot of people are missing the fact that the township didn't want to do this. The farmer saw this as a payday and was trying to extort money from them. They were willing to remove the part of the building that was on his land, but he refused to let them correct the issue; he said it was on his land, so no one could touch it. He didn't want it fixed because then he couldn't cash in on it. So they severed the part of the building on his property from the part on their property, and put a fence on the property line to ensure no claim can ever be made that anyone stepped across the property line. The township also told him that they will pay to have the remaining piece removed from his property at any time if he wants that to be done. He's just pissed off because he knows he'll never get that payday he was hoping for now. It wasn't a reasonable solution to a normal problem, but he purposely created a completely unreasonable problem for personal gain. If you research what happened, it seems pretty clear the farmer was the one who purposely forced this situation to happen, despite the way they tried to spin it in this news story.
  • The people of that county need to file a lawsuit against the county and demand that all of the people involved get fired for misused plublic funds
  • @kicknotes
    Does anyone else ever get depressed about how stupid this world has become? We're not evolving; we're going the opposite direction.
  • @davidweber4674
    My father and I built large houses. Any time we started a new home we would always find the property corners no matter how long it took so there could be no mistakes. One time it came up with a neighbor saying the one side driveway was on his property until we pulled a string and proved that his driveway was 1 1-2' over the line he couldn't get back in his house fast enough.
  • @toyotarizzle
    They offered to move the building and the property owner said no, you can't come on my property. Why would he not let them move it. Something is not being mentioned.
  • If it was the farmers building on township property they would have fined him for every day the structure stood on public property, then went after him for cutting the building in two peices like they did. This sounds like a HOA more than a government entity.
  • @Hathorr1067
    So, he wouldn't let the crew on his property that were there to take down the building that was on his property. WTF does he expect?
  • @2380Shaw
    A town with a name like "Ruggles" says stay the hell away.
  • @King_TuTT
    send the township rent for their structor on his property.
  • @skidoorulz4914
    So what damages did the farmer suffer from the shed being 6 feet on his property? Good for the township for doing what they did!
  • @Renville80
    Hey, thanks for respecting the deaf and making captions available.
  • @thomasgreen1688
    Is this real. 😆 My guess neither building meets code in that condition.
  • Out of all the problems in the world right now neighbors are arguing over this! Pfffft!
  • @SnookOnTheFly
    The government is so great at solving problems. What would we ever do without them?