The End of Haber Bosch

167,226
0
Published 2023-06-21
Correction: 7:20 The electrons in this equation should have a "-" indicating negative charge.

Billions of people rely on a single, hundred-year-old chemical reaction every day: nitrogen gas + hydrogen gas → ammonia. This simple, short reaction is a hidden monster: it consumes 1% of the world’s TOTAL energy supply and releases 2% of the world’s TOTAL carbon dioxide emissions. Join George on a quest to discover whether the Haber-Bosch reaction’s time is finally up.

You might also like other Reactions videos:

This Toxic Gas is Responsible for Almost All Our Food:
   • This Toxic Gas is Responsible for Alm...  

How Can Fertilizer Explode?
   • How Can Fertilizer Explode?  

Why Calcium Hydroxide + Corn is Key to Understanding Western Civilization (and Tacos)
   • Why Calcium Hydroxide + Corn is Key t...  

This is made of plants. Why do we call it “meat”?
   • Lab-grown, Plant-based, Real – What I...  

This Chemistry life hack is a lie:
   • this chemistry life hack is a lie  

Credits:
Executive Producer:
Matthew Radcliff

Producers:
Elaine Seward
Andrew Sobey
Darren Weaver

Writer:
Andrew Sobey

Host:
George Zaidan

Scientific Consultants:
Alexandr Simonov, Ph.D.
Leila Duman, Ph.D.
Brianne Raccor, Ph.D.

Executive in Charge for PBS: Maribel Lopez
Director of Programming for PBS: Gabrielle Ewing
Assistant Director of Programming for PBS: John Campbell

Reactions is a production of the #AmericanChemicalSociety.
© 2023 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.

Sources:

cen.acs.org/environment/green-chemistry/Industrial…

cen.acs.org/environment/green-chemistry/Chemists-m…

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg2371

www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05108-y

pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/ee/c5ee01…

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24242766/#:~:text=Collisio….

www.nature.com/articles/s41929-019-0280-0

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0022…

doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0455-8

All Comments (21)
  • @ACSReactions
    In the video we said we’d come back to this later, but then we cut it, so here it is as a comment: the next step in killing Haber-Bosch is figuring out how to get protons and electrons from water without causing all hell to break loose in the reaction vessel – and the same team that published the work described in this video thinks they can make it happen at the anode of this same device: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05108-y
  • @majorfallacy5926
    I remember in my first chemistry class the prof told us that if any of us find a process that can replace haber bosch, we should contact him for a research partnership cause that's an instant nobel price
  • @maxmusterman3371
    Now we only need tons of Trihexyltetradecylphosphonium and Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, which are propably both a breeze to make
  • @TheLeachKing
    I get disliking a useful chemical process because it polutes the air, or there are better ways to do the same thing. But disliking it because the guy who figured it out was evil is just...odd to me. It's not the prosess' fault.
  • @henryrroland
    3:34 Actually... This temperature is required because of kinetics. The reaction goes in favor of NH₃ when the temperature is low, but the time to produce increases... So it has a temperature optimal spot, where the thermodynamics is diminished, but the kinetics compensate for it
  • The story of Fritz Haber is one of the most tragic, yet gut wrenching in history. Veritasium has a great video on him and this process that I highly recommend watching.
  • @benjaminpainter378
    This is way too good to be true. Room temperature, 1/5th the pressure, 99%+ yields, using rare niche products, and in a portable device anyone could have? Just one of these would be astonishing, but all together it is too good to be true. Looks like researchers trying to get funding or some sort of recognition. But who knows, maybe I'm wrong? It looks easy enough to attempt, so let's try it out and see. I do hope this works, but I have seen this situation more than a few times.
  • @johnkern43
    I'm with Leila. How amazing that in about 5 minutes you are able to acknowledge that 1% of the global use of fossil fuel produces 50% of our worlds food production and then ignore the significance. Pretty high yield. I would vastly rather feed people than cars with fossil fuel. Of all of the uses of fossil fuel that people wish to abandon I would not be in a hurry to walk away from this one first, You and I would not be here and breathing at the same time if not for this process. Haber and Bosch, put these guys on a pedestal. Totally as an aside, as an undergraduate in chemistry some 50 years ago, I was directed to study German as the language of science. Yeah, the first posting in my career, Mexico.
  • @Petch85
    Honestly 2% of the world's CO2 emission for 50% of the world's food production, does not seem like a problem to me. We do not need to fly, it is just convenient, we need food.
  • When I started as a chemist, reading German was mandatory. I was an analytical chemist in an agricultural lab, so nitrogen chemistry was a big deal in my earliest days as a lab rat. A lot of the procedures we had to follow were only written in German. Well, that was 40 years ago. Maybe things are different now. Fortunately, technical German is not difficult for English speaking chemists.
  • @theodoreshasta7846
    One has to be skeptical of a new process which purports to be such an enormous improvement over Haber-Bosch. I admit to being beyond my depth and hope every bit of it is true. We need all the help we can get.
  • @jeffreyblack666
    Imagine if a pencil was invented ages ago and we were still using substantially the same process today? Imagine if a fire was invented eons ago, and people are still using it for cooking food while camping. Something being from a long time ago doesn't mean it is bad and needs to be replaced.
  • @ClearerThanMud
    LOVE the humor, and man those setting changes with no break in speech are trippy!
  • @olahafs
    The "NICE" at 69% killed me :D
  • @originalmianos
    This is the first vid from this presenter I have seen. It is great and I see another epic chemistry marathon coming right up.
  • @johnford7847
    Excellent video. I hope lots of high school chemistry and introductory college classes see this.
  • @samuelbarringer715
    Plants use nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation. Part of nitrogenase is FeMoCo which is an iron molybdenum cofactor that uses nitrogen in the air as a ligand.
  • @TheFPSChannel
    Two things I love: science and clever, carefully constructed edits. 👏👏
  • @simongross3122
    Awesome video. I can only partly understand the chemical equations, but your explanations were great.