Not Very Testosterone
9,930
Published 2024-07-26
discord.gg/ZJzn8h8bJW
Check out how I beat a 2200 Rapid player with a DUCK:
• The Guy Who HATES En Passant
Music used in this video:
Honkai Star Rail - Aberrant Receptacle
#chess #ChessBut
All Comments (21)
-
That should possibly count as a loss. Coward Chess - 100% lose rate - thus proving you’re not a coward.
-
Simp: This probably isn't going to be so bad Also Simp: Gets completely demolished by the challenge
-
I love the subtle "it's fine" when he gets an Indian player 😂
-
Forks, discovered checks, and a double check from a 100 rated player? (I mean, they were blundering at the same time and didn't know you were doing a challenge.) But... Well done!
-
The 100 rated players are even blundering their Edwards now!
-
I'm surprised that he didn't consider any fork to instantly end the video because he can't possibly retreat two pieces on the same move.
-
Game should've ended when a fork happened, since you cannot fulfill challenge requirements by retreating two pieces on one turn
-
3:54 I expected Simp to answer "100 rated" here
-
This challenge name should be "I am a coward" As opposted to simp always saying "I am not a coward"
-
Two interpretations: Either auto-lose when two pieces are attacked because you can't move them both away, or it ONLY applies when "ONE of your pieces" is attacked, so multi-attacks actually give you a free move.
-
Kabedon chess: If there is an enemy piece on the A or H file, your pieces, or pawns, that can move to the same rank in the adjacent file must go there to ask them out on a date.
-
2:56 the bishop failed to move. Challenge already failed.
-
I absolutely love that he calls the e pawn edward
-
I miss the wtf at the end. Happens rarely nowadays
-
Technically, the challenge forced you to retreat a piece from attacked position, not preventing you from moving a piece into an attacked position.
-
Capturing that knight would technically be moving the king to an unattacked square... as long as you consider standing still a move. And anyone who has ever implemented a Markov Chain knows you have to consider standing still a move to ensure you get a stationary distribution.
-
"so many likes" 5. 😐
-
*takes sip of estrogen*
-
I think the fork three minutes in actually just ends your video lol, since you can’t move both pieces to an unattached square at the same time
-
It's always Edward ;(
