This New Genetic Discovery Will Blow Your Mind!

Australian aborigines keep repeating that they are the original inhabitants of the land and have been here since 60 thousand years. Can’t wait to have some science to refute this nonsense. Good job guys. Much appreciated the series. Must get the book.

I like seeing the maps of how the countries changed over the centuries. I'm German descent. Arrived in USA in the 1800s. (Like you, I'm in WI.). Regarding climate change, I've always believed that the glaciers, for instance, have been melting for centuries.

Wow, such great stuff! I started watching this series and I can't get enough. Daniel 12:4 in talking about the end says "and knowledge shall increase". Well here we go!

30:48 It really is fun to study a subject like history when you have an immediate use for the knowledge :) Easy to stay focused, and you catch a lot more details than if you're just studying for the sake of completing a curriculum.

Excellent excellent. Excellent from start to finish so interesting I can’t stop watching.

This is so fascinating! My family tree traced one line back to Europe with that line coming to the US in the 1620s. To my surprise, my DNA testing indicated both Bengali and Han people. I discovered this about 5 years ago and after seeing this video it makes complete sense now.

Can't wait until we can all see our real family tree from around the world family tree once they find a way of doing that!

My mother always said our doe eyes came from the mongols Romanian and Italian. Mother's are always right 🤷

There are a lot of linguistic artifacts that make it appear as though South Asians that spoke Tamil actually had trading colonies is Europe at some period in history. Basque get tagged as having no linguistic relatives, but it's definitely related to two languages , Armenian and Tamil. If you line up sentences from these far distant languages together there are shocking similarities. When you think of the mechanics of how empires spread across the map its not that hard to believe. The soldiers of whatever empire happens to be on the rise kill most of the men of the area they conquer, introduce their lineage into the local women , leave some women behind , take some with them, and sell some of them somewhere else as slaves. This happens city after city, village after village after village, tribe after tribe, over MASSIVE areas of land, tragic but factual. To take that further, most of said soldiers of said empire are from a people group who are ALREADY related (the massive Roman empire started with a small tribe from Central Italy) Then think of how many times this has happened. The Persians, 600 to 350 bc, the Greeks, 350 to 100 bc the Romans 100 bc to 550 ad , the Muslims 650 to the 1800s ad, the crusades 1000s to 1200s the kahns, 1200s to 1500s European colonialism, 1500s to 2000s. When you take the ancient ubiquitous business of slavery itself into account, this pattern of an already closely related group of males spreading their seed far and wide follows the same insemination ratio , except the children produced by slave rapes tend to be born on the home turf of the dominant people group , while the war rapes of the same groups tend to be born abroad. What that culture does to the people around them when they rise to power tends to come back to them 200 to 500 years later on average. Taking all this history into account its not surprising that there would be end up being a very small amount of forgotten male progenitors we would find in our gene pool!

The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom

I was astonished to see my ancestry results. I figured that I'd be over 90% Ashkenazi Eastern European, and I am, but I'm also part Israeli, Greek and Mongol. I find it completely crazy, yet amazing. I can't help but wonder how exactly I became part mongolian. Probably Genghis Khan.

. It can happen in 2 generations my black and white child has a blonde haired green eyed child

Would be great to see you hook up with Randall Carlson to compare some notes ♥️

What about the gypsies?

Per a lot of the older historical records and paintings, the Eastern Steppe tribes like the Mongols were more Caucasian (blonde & light brown hair, blue eyes) prior to their conquest of China. When a land is conquered, each of the men often took home multiple young women as wives and concubines. And this of course will greatly change the genetics of a people, The historical records I am referring to are from several hundred years before the Mongol conquest of China and subsequent western expansion.

Which YDNA group are we talking about...R1a....?

Have you considered Alexander the Great’s invasion into India as the European/Indian connection?

The problem with this series is that population movements don't necessarily interbreed with other populations. In the case of the British in India, they certainly don't marry them. Same with migratory peoples into Europe. They often keep very much to themselves.

It WOULD be mind blowing

If Tiglath-Pileser III, an Assyrian conqueror in the 8th-century BCE, had taken European children as slaves and brought them back to his native country of northern Iraq, and if later these children (especially the male line) assimilated into the native culture and peoples, this will explain the haplogroup R1a2 that is prevalent in Assyrians today. It's all speculative and all very complicated.