ECG Theory Leads Einthoven Wilsons Central Terminal Placement
28,754
Published 2013-10-14
All Comments (21)
-
You are a great lecturer. I know you discussed the problem with I+II+II =0 somewhere below but many students who watch this video first time may miss it completely. Since lead II is reversed in this Einthoven's format, the correct formula is I+(-II)+III = o or I+III=o. Also what they add is voltage in this case (potential difference), not potentials at each electrode and sometimes you mention electrical information which many find it very confusing.. Also, the zero reference (null) point is in the center of the triangle and your reference to something bisecting I or II or III is confusing; it almost sounds like averaging two points to get the middle point and I don't think that is what is happening with this WCT case.
-
Thank you so much! I've had much clarity after watching this. God bless you.
-
Brilliant! Just what I needed, Thank you for sharing!
-
Thanks for something that actually makes sense and covers everything, was getting frustrated trawling through the rest of youtube!
-
What a great foundation! This opened up so much understanding for me.
-
Thanks for making all my concepts clear ...🙂🙂
-
Very detailed! Exactly what I am looking for!
-
thank you so much , exactly what i was searching for. completely understood.
-
Totally clarified everything for me, and put it into layman's terms. Thank you so much!
-
This one is really conceptual. Thanks a lot.
-
Excellent talk , thank you
-
Excellent video.
-
Thank you! This is very informative!
-
Waaah I LOVE ALL YOUR VIDEOS 💚 Thank you muaaah!
-
This is fabulous teaching !! Thanku so much 👏 Earned a subscriber
-
great explanation... thank you!
-
Thank you so much for this vedio it was really help me to understand the basic of EKG
-
Great video!
-
This is the absolute best video about ECG theory currently available on YouTube, thank you so much! Now I fully understand why some deflections are positive and others negative! Greetings from Italy 🇮🇹
-
thanks very nicely explained