How to use escaping closures in Swift | Continued Learning #20
18,728
2021-04-20に共有
Next video: • Codable, Decodable, and Encodable in ...
Last video: • How to use Typealias in Swift | Conti...
🤙 WELCOME BACK 🤙
WEBSITE: www.swiftful-thinking.com/
DISCORD: discord.gg/tSzJGx9RwE
GITHUB: github.com/SwiftfulThinking/
SAY THANKS: www.buymeacoffee.com/nicksarno
コメント (21)
-
Your tutorials are very practical compared to others, specially for people coming from other programming languages
-
Quite a clear explanation. Thanks a lot!
-
Another very well explained video!
-
Well explained. Thank you so much.
-
Wow, very concise and explained extremely clear
-
This is the only video i had watch twice to understand. Thanks nick..... ❤️✌️
-
Best explanation about escaping 🤩👏
-
I’ve seen like 5 videos about escaping but this one sank in easily 👍 thanks
-
I really felt like I got a handle on escaping for the first time, thanks very much for the clear explanation! Briefly included in here was an example of your approach to closures. I think I have a mental block for closures, as I've reviewed them dozens of times and momentarily felt like I almost understood them, only to have the understanding slip away again. I guess what I'm wondering is whether there is a way to know, in this video for example before you introduce the asynchronous task in downloadData3, how to decide upon when and how to use closures and completion handlers. In any case, keep up the great work, I really appreciate your effort and attention to detail!
-
Well explained. ✅
-
Your lessons are excellent!
-
i love you man you make the swiftUI so easy
-
lol.. love how you called "we went from this ugliness here" hahaha 🤣. Amazing tutorial as always Nick, Thanks!!
-
... after 14 minutes we saw the first example of code with escaping 🥳
-
you are the best! Thank you so much
-
Crystal clear
-
super video .. very welll explained
-
Had to run through this a few times. Struggle with this - my bad - not bright enough!
-
Well presented, but it still makes my head spin.
-
more and more difficult, but well explained