The SAT Question Everyone Got Wrong

11,147,847
0
Published 2023-11-30
How an SAT question became a mathematical paradox. Head to brilliant.org/veritasium to start your free 30-day trial, and the first 200 people get 20% off an annual premium subscription.

Special thanks to our Patreon supporters! Join this list to help us keep our videos free, forever:
ve42.co/PatreonDEB

I invented Snatoms, a molecule modeling kit where the atoms snap together magnetically. Try it at ve42.co/SnatomsV

Huge thanks to Dr. Doug Jungreis for taking the time to speak with us about this SAT question.
Thanks to Stellarium, a wonderful free astronomy simulator – ve42.co/Stellarium
Thanks to Newspapers.com, a database of historical newspapers – ve42.co/Newspapers

▀▀▀
References:
Summary of this problem by MindYourDecisions –    • Why did everyone miss this SAT Math q...  
More cool math about this problem by Kyle Hill –    • The SAT Question NO ONE Got Right  
Discussion of a solar day by MinutePhysics –    • Why December Has The Longest Days  
Murtagh, J. (2023). The SAT Problem That Everybody Got Wrong. Scientific American – ve42.co/SATSciAm
United Press International (1982). Error Found in S.A.T. Question. New York Times – ve42.co/SAT-NYT
Yang (2020). What's the hardest SAT math problem that you've seen? Quora – ve42.co/SATQuora
Coin rotation paradox via Wikipedia – ve42.co/CoinParadox
Simmons, B. (2015). Circle revolutions rolling around another circle. MathStackExchange. – ve42.co/CircleRoll
Sidereal time via Wikipedia – ve42.co/SiderealWiki
Solar Time vs. Sidereal Time via Las Cumbres Observatory – ve42.co/SiderealLCO

Images & Video:
Zotti, G., et al. (2021). The Simulated Sky: Stellarium for Cultural Astronomy Research - ve42.co/Stellarium
Newspapers from 1980s - 1990s via Newspapers.com – ve42.co/Newspapers
SAT Practice Test via the College Board – ve42.co/PracticeSAT
Revolution Definition via NASA – ve42.co/RevolutionNASA
Revolution Definition via Merriam-Webster – ve42.co/RevolutionWebster
Earth motion animation via NASA – ve42.co/OrbitNASA
Satellite animation via NASA – ve42.co/SatNASA

▀▀▀
Special thanks to our Patreon supporters:
Adam Foreman, Anton Ragin, Balkrishna Heroor, Bernard McGee, Bill Linder, Burt Humburg, Chris Harper, Dave Kircher, Diffbot, Evgeny Skvortsov, Gnare, John H. Austin, Jr., john kiehl, Josh Hibschman, Juan Benet, KeyWestr, Lee Redden, Marinus Kuivenhoven, Max Paladino, Meekay, meg noah, Michael Krugman, Orlando Bassotto, Paul Peijzel, Richard Sundvall, Sam Lutfi, Stephen Wilcox, Tj Steyn, TTST, Ubiquity Ventures

▀▀▀
Directed by Emily Zhang
Written by Emily Zhang and Gregor Čavlović
Edited by Peter Nelson
Animated by Ivy Tello and Fabio Albertelli
Filmed by Derek Muller
Produced by Emily Zhang, Han Evans, Gregor Čavlović, and Derek Muller

Thumbnail by Ren Hurley
Additional video/photos supplied by Getty Images and Pond5
Music from Epidemic Sound

All Comments (21)
  • @duckyfam9012
    “I was amazed how badly it’s worded,” literally half of the SAT problems.
  • @KevinJDildonik
    To all the 1st posters: YouTube takes up to 15 minutes to gather data on a video before showing stats. Everyone in the first 15 minutes all think they're first.
  • @NoraOlson-ct7nr
    Having the small circle rotating 3 times with the camera rotating is the best intuitive explanation of what's going on I've ever seen for something like this
  • @monopolyking879
    I am currently 6 weeks from earning a Purdue Aerospace Engineering BS, I have completed the requirements for a physics minor, ive taken 2 graduate level astronomy courses and a graduate level Space Traffic Management course that dealt with sidereal time on every assignment, but this is easily the best conceptual explanation of sidereal time I have ever seen. Genuinely incredible educational content, I'm blown away.
  • @5MadMovieMakers
    This was a mentally challenging video to watch first thing in the morning. I'm awake now
  • @felixp535
    That part about the circle rotating around the triangle was mind-blowing. You instantly understand why it's not the same if the circle rolls on a flat line or rolls on a curved line
  • @pommyknocker
    This explanation is the best i have found. The idea of the distance the centre of the planet circle travels and then deriving ratios makes the most sense to me and your graphics helped me to grasp this. It's fascinating. Not too mention the perspective element influencing the answer!! What i didn't realise is that the extra rotation is accounted for as well if observing from the perspective from the centre of the "sun" circle by the fact that the observer has to rotate once to continuously observe the "planet" circle
  • @GodAesthetics
    I wasn’t the best at math in high school not because I didn’t get the right answers but because I could visualize the problem. My problem is I couldn’t show how I got the answer. This one is easy. In my head I just rolled it around and got the right answer. This is geometry for me. Visually simple.
  • @Darth_Insidious
    I was confused for a second until I realized that if you set the radius of the big circle to 0, or in other words rotate the smaller circle around a point on its circumference, it takes 1 full rotation for the circle to end up back at the start.
  • @Shepard-Thomas
    In college, I took a poetry class and once had an answer marked wrong on a test. Confident in my response, I reached out to the poet themselves, who affirmed I was right and even communicated this to my professor. Despite not being a fan of poetry, that moment made me quite proud!
  • @aprskgp
    This concept is quite important while solving Rotation problems in Physics. Instantaneous Centre of Rotation, given that it is pure rolling i.e. there is no slipping at the point of contact. It at this centre of instanteous rolling the entire circle or rigid body is pure rotating. Thanks for sharing.
  • @fpgaguy
    I appreciate every one of your videos, they always make me think, and sometimes make my head hurt. Thank you.
  • @TupperWallace
    The 1872 novel “Around the World in Eighty Days” had a plot that depended on this kind of situation. Phileas Fogg traveled around the world eastward, against the earth’s rotation. Though initially he thought he’d missed the 80 day deadline by some hours, in fact only 79 days had passed in London. One extra rotation had passed beneath his feet. He won the prize, married the girl and lived happily ever after.
  • @forkmonkey
    Another fun way to conceptualize the N+1 is to ask what happens if the circumference of B is 0. A still has to rotate around that point, one time. Great video.
  • @sprockethead323
    Honestly one of the best random fact and knowledge shows I have seen in quite a while.
  • @Jazzerizer
    no wonder everyone got them wrong, there was no correct answer
  • @Spondre
    I loved the "I hope so" answer from Doug at the end. It highlights the most important lesson I learned during my education: "I might be wrong."
  • @gregnixon1296
    It makes the story even better to know that one of the students who found the SAT error became a mathematician.
  • @_Euphorion_
    I've just found your channel and it is really brilliant. Keep up with the good work :)
  • @josrthorst6316
    This is really interesting! I initially interpreted it as the revolutions answer (1) and was immediately very thrown off by the answer options. Very cool to learn about this type of math problem!