What is a Rhizome? | Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari | Keyword
18,214
Publicado 2021-12-09
If you want to support me, you can do that with these links:
Patreon: www.patreon.com/theoryandphilosophy
paypal.me/theoryphilosophy
Twitter: @DavidGuignion
IG: @theory_and_philosophy
Podbean: theoretician.podbean.com/
Todos los comentarios (21)
-
Thanks I was actually wondering what a Rhizome is. Still not sure whether I should plant bamboo or not.
-
Gearing up to read Anti Oedipus! These videos help a lot.
-
EXPLAIN RHIZOMES TO M- oh, okay. Thank you!
-
Left alone, tweezer free, I imagine your eyebrows could be rather rhizomatic. They're wondrous.
-
Loved your explanation, David! A fascinating keyword with layers of meaning.
-
What I find interesting how these rather associative, vague concepts end up inspiring the quite sharp and interesting analysis in nomadology, which seems to have been pioneering at the time.
-
I am studying about diagram in Japanese art university. Your talk is comprehensive and useful. thank you
-
Thank you so much for the very well-organized explanation of this concept.
-
You made it a lot simpler to understand man thanks a lot
-
What you are doing is extremely important. Keep up the good work.
-
Very well done and pedagogical, thanks.
-
Thank you very very much for your incredible videos!
-
good video actually helped shed alot of light on this idea which im using for an undergraduate paper
-
Great presentation!
-
Great explanation, thank you for this helpful video :)
-
This was really good.
-
Hey man, good stuff. Would love to see a collision between Deleuzian ontology of difference and multiplicity, and Adorno's negative dialectics. I know Deleuze was critical of the dialectic as a metaphysics, and refuses teleogy in that way, but couldn't Adorno's negative dialectics be a different case? I know way more about Deleuze than Adorno, and I've only glanced at summaries of Adorno's negative dialectics, but they seem instinctively compatible in my mind for some reason. Isn't finding what is non-identical in a thing the same as affirming its difference in itself? anyway, happy I found this channel and cheers for making these kinds of vids!
-
reminds of object orientated programing, with it's four principles of abstraction, encapsulation, polymorphism, and inheritance. Whereas functional programming is more tree like.
-
I find this concept similar to Wittgenstein's family resemblance and anti essence approach
-
Please, activate the subtitle option