This Will Be My Most Disliked Video On YouTube | Climate Change

Day 12 UPDATE: Still at 89%! This is my most disliked video ever, by a wide margin (by nearly 3x)! But thank you to the many people who did like and enjoy this video 🙏 - Day 4 Edit: 89%! - 53- hour EDIT: Back down to 90% - 12-hour EDIT: We are up to 91%! Still the lowest on the channel but an improvement! For those wondering, we are 37 mins in and I'm sitting at 88% likes... which for this channel is very low.

As George Carlin said, "The planet will be fine. The people are fucked"

The fact that merely talking about this topic is now considered 'controversial' and 'political' says a lot about the state of modern society.

Telling the truth in times of deceit is considered a revolutionary act

when your scale is 500 million years, you can't expect your initial 100 years of measurements to fall in line with what you assume is correct about your original scale. Especially when data sets have been manipulated multiple times.

"Maybe if governments and media were more busy with explaining and educating, rather than fear mongering and furthering their own political goals, more people would listen."

The controversy surrounding this issue arises when the upper crust of society tells you that your cow is causing climate change, while flying a private jet to their special meetings about how to take away your cow, for causing climate change.

"If we get them to squabble over temperature and carbon we can keep on polluting like there is no tomorrow."

The obvious red alert answer, if red alert is what you want to label it, is fission reactors until fusion can take over 20/30 years maybe down the line. Get them up and let’s move on to other things. Thanks

The fact that this is considered controversial is ridiculous.

Most people don't like climate change; I agree

1 thing I still struggle with is, if the land ice mass is melting at a rapid rate and the oceans are warming, why am I not observing a faster ocean rise rate.

We don't need to know the actual temperature 1000 years ago. Historical records clearly state how there was a thriving wine industry in what is now the UK as late as the 13th century, and we know what type of climate is required to grow grapes. In fact, in the late 13th century, Britain was exporting wine to France. I think it's safe to say that there is no wine industry in the UK exporting its product to France today; hence, we know that the temperature was warmer during the medeival warm period than it is today.

If governments and institutions have been corporately captured, how can we trust them to not solely look after their own interests and use extreme political measures against us?

The fact that this subject is characterized as "sensitive" or "controversial" is mind boggling to me

As a Dutch person, I see this as a giant business opportunity. If you need to keep water at bay call the Dutch. Guaranteed business for 100 years to come!

I consider myself really incredibly informed about climate. However I have learnt a lot from this, about context and how we have come to the conclusions we have today. Also how ignorant I was to an astonishing amount of historical data capture. Very very well done piece. ❤

Maybe if governments and media were more busy with explaining and educating, rather than fear mongering and furthering their own political goals, more people would listen.

Irony here is that habitat such as grasslands held carbon back, keeping it out of the atmosphere, and now recommending "burying" carbon in the oceans. How about stopping habitat destruction and engaging in habitat restoration? No one ever seems to talk about these options.

Saving to watch later, but thx for tackling it; even tho I haven't watched yet, I know you work hard on your uploads and it'll be generally good.