Imaginary Erdős Number - Numberphile

406,246
0
Publicado 2014-11-26
Ron Graham on imaginary Erdős Numbers.
More Ron Graham Videos: bit.ly/Ron_Graham
More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓

Numberphile merch: www.numberphile.com/merchandise
Calculate Erdős Numbers (and collaboration distance) here: www.ams.org/mathscinet/collaborationDistance.html

Patreon: www.patreon.com/numberphile
WITH THANKS TO THESE PATREON SUPPORTERS:
Herschal Sanders

OK Merli
Alex Bozzi
Spiked Math
Filipe Junqueira
Bill Shillito
Andrzej 'Yester' Fiedukowicz
Stan Ciprian
Tracy Parry
Micky Baeza
plusunim

Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/numberphile

NUMBERPHILE
Website: www.numberphile.com/
Numberphile on Facebook: www.facebook.com/numberphile
Numberphile tweets: twitter.com/numberphile
Subscribe: bit.ly/Numberphile_Sub

Numberphile is supported by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI): bit.ly/MSRINumberphile

Videos by Brady Haran

Brady's videos subreddit: www.reddit.com/r/BradyHaran/

Brady's latest videos across all channels: www.bradyharanblog.com/

Sign up for (occasional) emails: eepurl.com/YdjL9

Numberphile T-Shirts: teespring.com/stores/numberphile
Other merchandise: store.dftba.com/collections/numberphile

Todos los comentarios (21)
  • @veggiet2009
    This is actually cool. Having numbers that refer to mathematicians is kind of meta.
  • @jeremyj.5687
    I like these little jokes and jests researchers can come up with. Proof to anyone that intelligence and wit are often intertwined.
  • @BeCurieUs
    Reminds me of the Alpher–Bethe–Gamow paper, Bethe really didn't have anything to do it, but Gamow thought it would be funny to have ABG in it to represent the 3 main types of radiation, Alpha, Beta, and Gamma...gotta love it!
  • @KemaTheAtheist
    0:26 Is anyone else smiling gleefully because he said, "He had a theory, but not a real theory, that..." in order to distinguish what he was saying about the theory to mean the colloquial sense of the term rather than the scientific?
  • @T4T4GBoX
    Finally a Hungarian Maths reformer too!
  • @YusufNasihi
    Congratulations to Brady for having an Erdos number.
  • @112048112048
    I don't think that final note is really valid. Someone's Erdos number can't decrease, since the original shortest path will always exist. Jerry Griggs has and always will have published a paper with G. W. Peck, meaning he will always have an Erdos number of magnitude equal to or less than 1+i.
  • @pkabai
    Thank you. I have now looked for sites to compute my Erdős number which turned out to be 3 (well, 4 by most paths). Great fun!  
  • @WarpRulez
    That was a bit confusing video. Ok, perhaps "confusing" is a bit too strong of a word. Vague, perhaps?
  • @lindhe
    You should do some episodes on the axioms of mathematics! :)
  • @ianfoote
    At about 2:50 Ron uses the standard Euclidean norm (L2) to suggest that 1 + i is closer to 0 than 2 is. However I think the Manhattan norm (L1) is more appropriate here, where the distance is 2 in both cases.
  • I find it preposterous that people are allowed to publish under fake names. It is not as bad as faking data (Golden chopsticks video), but still very bad because the person could publish fake data and you would never be able to find the original author (or a person which happens to have that name gets in trouble instead).
  • @alaricsmith5558
    Brilliant! In Mammalogy, this used to be quite common, too.