Kagan Raises Bribery Hypothetical When Questioning Jack Smith's Lawyer On Presidential Immunity
103,263
Published 2024-04-26
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&…
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com/
All Comments (21)
-
Kagan, talking about bribes, does she mean the President can be convicted of Bribery for his family receiving millions of dollars after the president does favors for the parties giving money to his family?
-
Sounds like the bribery discussion revolves around the former VP…just saying
-
Is she talking about Biden and Ukraine?
-
So how does the Supreme Court view the department of justice conniving to put the former president, who is also the front runner, in jail to keep him from being reelected
-
Why would a DA take this case and allow themselves to seem so ignorant pushing this garbage? At least the SC is making him look sufficiently idiotic
-
Use of official use of power for private gain, dude you’re not talking about the former guy at 1600, you’re talking about current residents.
-
So Joe ought to be next in line to prosecute?
-
Smith's lawyer is helping Trumps case, Dreeben seemed to be stuck on "hypotheticals" while Kagen was looking at specifics. Interpreting law and inserting what is not said as "assumed" is dangerous.
-
That Judge throwing in “hypotheticals”, you can see through her reasoning what’s behind them. 👎🏻
-
What about the VP Involved in bribery? 😮
-
I begining to think hes arguing about biden
-
Bribery, joe better beware how they rule.
-
The Hypotheticals were flying thick and fast the past couple of days. Lib-Dems LOVE posing them but otherwise won't deal with them at all.
-
It sounds like they're talking about Biden and his administration
-
Why do u think bribery was mentioned?
-
Quid pro Joe will not be immune.
-
Um, bribery is SPECIFICALLY listed as an impeachable offense. How can these justices be allowed to remain if they don't even know this?
-
This guy and his I THINK doesn't actually mean it is!!!!
-
You mean like Biden shaking down Ukraine?
-
Yes, get the briber in chief Brib'em. Lock him up.