Where Is The Center of The Universe?

1,978,878
0
Published 2022-03-23
Learn More about Brilliant: brilliant.org/SpaceTime/

Take the Space Time Fan Survey Here: forms.gle/wS4bj9o3rvyhfKzUA

PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to:to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE

Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord!
www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime

Today we’re going to ask a simple-seeming question that will lead to so pretty wacky places. The question is this: If the universe has a center, where is it?

Check out the Space Time Merch Store
www.pbsspacetime.com/shop

Sign up for the mailing list to get episode notifications and hear special announcements!
mailchi.mp/1a6eb8f2717d/spacetime

Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
Written by Matt Caplan & Matt O'Dowd
Post Production by Leonardo Scholzer, Yago Ballarini, Pedro Osinski, Adriano Leal & Stephanie Faria
GFX Visualizations: Ajay Manuel
Directed by Andrew Kornhaber
Assistant Producer: Setare Gholipour
Executive Producers: Eric Brown & Andrew Kornhaber
Executives in Charge (PBS): Adam Dylewski, Maribel Lopez
Director of Programming (PBS): Gabrielle Ewing

Spacetime is produced by Kornhaber Brown for PBS Digital Studios.
This program is produced by Kornhaber Brown, which is solely responsible for its content.
© 2021 PBS. All rights reserved.

End Credits Music by J.R.S. Schattenberg: youtube.com/user/MultiDroideka

Special Thanks to Our Patreon Supporters
Big Bang Supporters
rpeterson2205
Mark Evans
David Taiclet
Daniel Alexiuc
Nenado763
Peter Barrett
David Neumann
Charlie
Leo Koguan
Sandy Wu
Ahmad Jodeh
Alexander Tamas
Morgan Hough
Amy
Juan Benet
Vinnie Falco
Fabrice Eap
Mark Rosenthal
David Nicklas
Henry Van Styn

Quasar Supporters
Alex Kinsey
Alex Kern
Ethan Cohen
Stephen Wilcox
Christina Oegren
Mark Heising
Hank S

Hypernova Supporters
william bryan
Sergio Bonfiglio
drollere
Joe Moreira
Marc Armstrong
Scott Gorlick
Paul Stehr-Green
MuON Marketing
Russell Pope
Ben Delo
Scott Gray
Антон Кочков
John R. Slavik
Mathew
Donal Botkin
John Pollock
Edmund Fokschaner
Joseph Salomone
chuck zegar
Jordan Young
Daniel Muzquiz

Gamma Ray Burst Supporters
Frank Walker
Matt Q
WhizBangery
Tony Affinito
Avi Yashchin
MHL SHS
Kory Kirk
Terje Vold
Anatoliy Nagornyy
comboy
Brett Baker
Jeremy Soller
Jonathan Conerly
Andre Stechert
Ross Bohner
Paul Wood
Kent Durham
jim bartosh
Nubble
Chris Navrides
Scott R Calkins
The Mad Mechanic
Ellis Hall
John H. Austin, Jr.
Diana S
Ben Campbell
Faraz Khan
Almog Cohen
Alex Edwards
Ádám Kettinger
MD3
Endre Pech
Daniel Jennings
Cameron Sampson
Pratik Mukherjee
Geoffrey Clarion
Nate
Darren Duncan
Russ Creech
Jeremy Reed
Eric Webster
David Johnston
Web Browser
Michael Barton
Christopher Barron
James Ramsey
Justin Jermyn
Mr T
Andrew Mann
Isaac Suttell
Devon Rosenthal
Oliver Flanagan
Bleys Goodson
Robert Walter
Bruce B
Simon Oliphant
Mirik Gogri
Mark Delagasse
Mark Daniel Cohen
Brandon Lattin
Nickolas Andrew Freeman
Shane Calimlim
Tybie Fitzhugh
Robert Ilardi
Eric Kiebler
Craig Stonaha
Martin Skans
The Art of Sin
Graydon Goss
Frederic Simon
Tonyface
John Robinson
A G
David Neal
Kevin Lee
justahat
John Funai
Cass Costello
Tristan
Bradley Jenkins
Kyle Hofer
Daniel Stříbrný
Luaan
AlecZero
Cody
King Zeckendorff
Nick Virtue
Scott Gossett
Dan Warren
Patrick Sutton
Daniel Lyons
DFaulk
Kevin Warne

All Comments (21)
  • @ardag1439
    Duh, it is at (0,0,0) obviously. I'll have that Nobel prize now.
  • @_tycr0
    Nobody has ever made me feel more passionate about things I can’t remotely understand than Matt.
  • @Vlasko60
    "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough". If that quote is true, then no one who has explained it to me understands it well enough.
  • After about 2 years of trying to properly understand this topic, this is the video that finally made it click for me. Excellent job!
  • @technocore1591
    The explanation of how 2d person can point anywhere and be pointing at the center of the universe and it's applicability to a 3d universe was sublime. Thank you. I understood it.
  • @OleOlson
    I consider myself pretty well versed for an amateur who has only taken a half dozen classes on Astronomy, but the material on PBS SpaceTime is way beyond me. And I love it.
  • Love this guy. You know new possibilities will be discovered listening to him because he says "But, I'm not sure" fairly regularly. Sometimes I have to watch an episode twice (unavoidable since he goes a bit beyond a documentary for us average brains). I think I've watched all of them since they started !
  • @px43
    So, along with the 2D surface on a sphere analogy, would that also mean that sending two ships in opposite directions, approaching the speed of light, that they might run into each other again at the "opposite side" of our universe? Or maybe we could look in two different directions and see the same ancient star?
  • @DrZedDrZedDrZed
    I love this show so much. Thank you Matt ands PBS and everyone who helps make this real. I'm having a kid and I can't wait for the day that I start watching the whole back catalogue of Space Time with him.
  • Love these segments both questioning and reaffirming assumptions, leading to a deeper understanding
  • @LMarti13
    The reason why this is the best physics channel is that every other channel would simply put out a video explaining that there is no center. The same old stuff. When this channel asks a question, even if it's a "basic" one, I know I'm going to learn a ton.
  • I have never been helped this much with the geometry of the cosmos. Now one of my all time favorite videos! Thank you so much 🥰
  • @peristanom
    If "closed", "open", or "flat" applies to the spatial shape of a universe, would that in any way also apply to its temporal shape? That is, would a spatially finite "closed" universe eventually and necessarily recollapse? Would a spatially infinite "open" universe necessarily expand forever? Would the expansion rate of a spatially infinite "flat" universe necessarily approach zero? Or are these entirely different properties?
  • @Malkovith2
    You can take simple questions, explore topics I'm sure I've heard plenty about and yet you always manage to give me new insights. I love it!
  • @andrew13651
    A problem that keeps coming up IMO is that when we talk about all these ideas about ST we use a 'zoom' function in a very similar way as when we take a picture here on earth. What if zooming in and out on any scale (microscopes and/or very macro scales) is similar to how we used to think about size of universe (obviously its contracting because matter is inside and at some point the gravitational pull brings all matter back towards each other - wrong) so what if the way we conceptualize the zoom function regarding edge of universe shape of universe multiverse etc cant be zoomed so simply. What if there is a nonlinear [zoom constraint] of sorts....it would change our interpretations and assumptions from, and could unlock another piece of the puzzle to what is shape/what does it tell us... in a time dimensional blob? 'Zooming' needs to be put under a microscope!
  • @zeroformsora
    You should do an episode on Chirality versus Helicity! The whole the imaginary number line is fundamental to how the universe works is just wild to me, I would love to hear your explanation
  • @frasercain
    Finally, now I can point people at this video for the answer.
  • @julienston876
    Great subject and amazing episode, as always Any chance that the Euclid mission could help getting closer to an answer?
  • @QuesoCookies
    If every one of infinite points is equidistant from every other point, that would mean that every point in the universe is the center of the universe, so, technically, I am the center of the universe. You may bow.
  • @MirceaKitsune
    Here's a fun one: Next time you go out for a walk, imagine you're still located in the same place, you're just using your feet to scroll the world under you instead. Theoretically this perspective is also correct since everything is relative. So yes, we may be at the center of the universe if that center is the point of our perception.