Andy Bannister vs Peter Singer • Do we need God to be good?

Published 2018-11-02
For more debates, updates and bonus content sign up at www.thebigconversation.show/

Atheist moral philosopher Peter Singer and Christian thinker Andy Bannister on 'Evolution, morality and being human: Do we need God to be good?'. They debate human rights, dignity, disability, the moral argument for God, suffering and much more.

The Big Conversation is a unique video series from Unbelievable? featuring world-class thinkers across the Christian and atheist community. Exploring science, faith, philosophy and what it means to be human.

Listen to more sparkling conversations every week via the Unbelievable? podcast www.premierchristianradio.com/...

The Big Conversation series:

Jordan Peterson & Susan Blackmore    • Jordan Peterson vs Susan Blackmore • ...  

Steven Pinker & Nick Spencer    • Steven Pinker vs Nick Spencer • Have ...  

Derren Brown & Rev Richard Coles    • Derren Brown & Rev Richard Coles • Ca...  

John Lennox & Michael Ruse    • Michael Ruse vs John Lennox • Science...  

Daniel Dennett & Keith Ward -    • Daniel Dennett vs Keith Ward • Are we...  

Andy Bannister vs Peter Singer -    • Andy Bannister vs Peter Singer • Do w...  

The Big Conversation is produced by Premier in partnership with the Templeton Religion Trust

Videos, updates, exclusive content www.thebigconversation.show/

All Comments (21)
  • @Fuzzawakka
    As an atheist I absolutely love Justin. He is by far my favorite theist interviewer. He treats us atheists with respect and comes across as genuine. Keep up the great interviews. I really enjoyed the dialogue between Peter and the theist. Peter is a brilliant thinker.
  • @luke31ish
    These types of talks are way more interesting and fruitful than the exhausted "atheism vs Christianity" debates.
  • @JohnThomas
    Great to watch this polite debate between Peter and Andy again. I like the way Peter cleared up some of the misconceptions Andy and Justin had about his views. It's not easy to find holes in the arguments of a philosophical heavyweight like him. He is logical, easy to understand and forceful.
  • @gipperbr
    I absolutely love the sincerely respectful way that Peter and Andy discuss ideas that they disagree about. They both clearly and confidently present their arguments, but neither of them seems motivated by "winning" the argument. They both seem to truly hear the other and have open minds that could be swayed or changed if they were to hear a sufficiently convincing argument or evidence. Far too often the participants in discussions or debates such as this one are extremely close-minded and exhibit an air of intellectual, moral, or spiritual superiority.
  • @MatticusPrime1
    I agree with Peter Singer that a being’s dignity or worth is not predicated on membership to a specific species. Andy Bannister seems to believe it does and he never addressed this sufficiently.
  • @highfunq2863
    Wonderfully pleasant discussion. This has been one of the least confrontational and positive conversations I've seen, debating such contentious ideas, in a long time. Well done!
  • @santiagolgb
    Thank you very much. For my money, one of the best conversations I’ve watched on the show.
  • So refreshing to hear two respectful people who are well read, knowledgeable and thoughtful discussing controversial topics with respect and dignity. A complete role model for all the other screamers and head bangers out there. THANK YOU.
  • @garyhughes1664
    Peter Singer is a wonderful writer and thinker. This was a superb discussion and I really enjoyed watching it.
  • Justin is brilliant and very likable! I really appreciate his understanding the issues well enough to ask the most pertinent questions..... Kudos!
  • @Bibappu
    What a great discussion, salute to all participants!
  • @kershacevedo
    Peter Singer is a truly great mind. Wonderful conversation.
  • @peterf90
    Both Peter and Andy were excellent and the mutual respect and civility of their conversation was quite refreshing. Also Justin the interviewer is very good at framing the discussion so that the average person can understand the material being covered. Great video subscribed.
  • @tarjep
    Super interesting debate, loved it!
  • @DingoStylz
    Great discussion. Both respectful and still explored their world views
  • @Lexaire
    This video is criminally underwatched. So many of yours are.
  • @serrendiptiy
    I thought it very wrong that Andy used Peter's mother in the discussion. I thought that though he apologised beforehand, that does not absolve him of trying to make a point in very poor judgement and indeed, the purpose of the apology was simply to enable him to bring the point out for discussion.